How freaking gay can you get?  They are offering $200,000 reward for information that can lead to the arrest of Tom Donovan.  According to the article I read, it’s basically a bunch of communists pissed because the chamber has stood it’s ground and represented it’s members instead of jumping on the Kiss the liberal messiah’s butt tour.  They are upset because the chamber opposes climate change legislation.  Guess what you moron’s, most Americans don’t believe in climate change either.  There are more Americans that don’t believe in the liberal fairy tale anymore.  You can’t put bounty’s on everyone’s head.

Hitler would be proud of the members of the Velvet Underground who feel that they should be able to determine what’s right and what’s wrong and damn you for standing in the way of their queer utopia.  Because that’s what it is.  They are trolling for criminal information on Donovan just because he’s opinions don’t match theirs.

Velvet Underground is too stupid to understand that this is the bullshit tactics have created 2 different sides on the global warming issue.  Their side, attempts to silence critics with blackmail and threats.  Our side says hold on one damn second here, Science exists on opposing views.  It makes you wonder exactly why they are using these tactics if the science really is on their side.  Now their attitudes more likely reflect that the science is not real and they have to act this way because when the rubber hits the road, they have no untainted facts to support their cause.

One of the basic problems about our inexperienced president with no private sector management experience is that he’s completely oblivious to the holidays and how retail hires a lot of TEMPORARY workers.  His inexperience shows when he’s out there saying 10% unemployment is a good sign.  Once January hits, those jobs go away.  They ARE NOT permanent positions.

If you look back in my archives, I said that the stimulus jobs are only temporary.  None of the funds we spent on stimulus was designed to create permanent jobs.  People argued with me on the point but after the construction projects are done, there is no more need for these jobs to stay.  The stimulus was payoff for those who helped Obama get elected.  It was not designed to help the unemployment rate long term.  Why do you think the Republicans refused to vote for the stimulus.  The stimulus was the biggest waste of money ever spent by the government.

Obama isn’t intelligent enough to figure out why the employment figures aren’t up.  He’s threatening businesses with card check, higher taxes/public option, and crap and tax.  How is this encouraging employment?  On the crap and tax bill, Obama purposefully lied his ass off when he quoted the cost as the cost of a stamp per day.  Someone filed a Freedom of Information Act request on a report about Crap and Tax and learned that it will cost us $1,700 a year.  Wow, postage stamps are going up to $5 a stamp?  How can a business afford such financial darkness.  The Obama administration is trying to kill jobs with their policies.

To generate jobs, Obama will have to get rid of card check, stop government health care, stop crap and tax, and get out of the way so the private sector can regenerate.

PMSNBC show host, Chris Matthews, showed what a POS he really is yesterday by declaring the cadets at West Point, the enemy camp.  Chris Matthews has made my hall of shame 2 times since the election, the first time when he talked about getting a thrill up his leg when talking about Barak Huisane Obama.

That is exactly who the left in this country are.  Chris, I’m going to give you a clue about something you obviously know absolutely nothing about.  The cadets were shocked that our fumbler-in-chief would announce when we were pulling the troops out.  That was perhaps one of, the so-called smartest man in America, dumbest statements to date!!!!  That is one detail that should have been omitted from a public speech.  They were marveling about how big of an idiot he is. Does it occur to you that Al Quaeda is listening you dumbass?  They’ve got their strategy down now.  They are going to lay low and go on a intimidation campaign.  They will hit up all of the villagers and tell them that they shouldn’t help the US because we are leaving in 18 months and that when the military leaves, they are going to kill them.  Of course the left are extremely stupid and this thought wouldn’t occur to them.  Chris you ignorant POS that is called intel of great value.

I think Chris needs to go to Afghanistan so he can see first hand what an enemy camp really is.  Yes, I’d like to see Chris find himself in the middle of a war zone where he really does not know which person wants to slit his stomach open to see what he had for lunch.  Then maybe he can stop being an ignorant POS and have a little bit of understanding of what the troops go through.  He won’t do anything like this because he is a coward.  Life’s good sitting back collecting his paycheck and running assassination pieces on the troops.

Did you notice towards the end of the speech they perked up when he started talking about freedom?  Rush Limbaugh said that he believes this was a photo op.  He repeated the same speech he gave back in March 09.  In other words, he should have let Charlie Brown Christmas show air since there was nothing new there.

The Wall Street Journal did a study on all of the president’s advisors and their private business experience.  Only 8% of Obama’s advisers have private sector experience.  That’s right, the so-called brightest man in America is shooting in the dark to fix the economy because none of his advisors have any clue.  Obama’s administration rivals Jimmy Carter’s administration.  He only had 30% with private sector experience.  EVERY other president had successful businessmen/women at the tune of 50-54%.

Obama went out of his way to place anti-capitalist people in key positions.  That is by design.  I don’t expect any hope and change in the coming months/years as far as the economy goes.  Even Obama’s jobs seminar is a photo op.  He didn’t invite anyone who could offer valued opinions.  He made sure he sent invites to the butt kissers only.  You can’t have meaningful dialouge with a bunch of butt kissers, it’s just not going to happen.

I’m sorry but the media is starting to look lamer by the day.  Every one of the Lame Street media is more concerned about the rumors of Tiger Woods crash than covering the global warming scandel.  Honestly who gives a sh*t about whether or not Tiger Woods if having an extramarital affair.  It’s his and his wife’s business not mine. 

That being said, Science and the media are in cahoots with each other.  Most of the media refuses to discuss the real issues and the real implications of the hacked emails saying that “Well this was private emails and we’re not going to publish them.”  Really?  They had no problems publishing Sarah Palin’s hacked emails.  What in the hell happened?  Did they wake up after the election and proclaim that they wouldn’t do such a deceitful thing again?  Nothing has changed and if that had been Sarah Palin’s emails they’d have published the damn things and not had a case of remorse.  I’m going to briefly go over some of the stuff contained in the emails and you guys can decide on your own if these individuals are fraudelent.

Celebrating a sceptic death

From: Phil Jones, Thu Jan 29 14:17:01 2004
In an odd way this is cheering news !

Really?  They are celebrating the death of one of their staunchest critics?  Although this isn’t illegal, it does show exactly what kind of individuals these scientists are.

Wrong data and practices

From: Tom Wigley, Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:36:15 -0700
We probably need to say more about this. Land warming since 1980 has been twice the ocean warming — and skeptics might claim that this proves that urban warming is real and important.

From: Kevin Trenberth, before Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:01:24 -0600
The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.

From: Michael Mann Date: 27/10/2009, 16:54
Perhaps we’ll do a simple update to the Yamal post, e.g. linking Keith/s new page–Gavin t? As to the issues of robustness, particularly w.r.t. inclusion of the Yamal series, we actually emphasized that (including the Osborn and Briffa ‘06 sensitivity test) in our original post! As we all know, this isn’t about truth at all, its about plausibly deniable accusations.

From: Phil Jones, Date: Thu Mar 19 17:02:53 2009
In my 2 slides worth at Bethesda I will be showing London’s UHI and the effect that it hasn’t got any bigger since 1900. It’s easy to do with 3 long time series

From: Darrell Kaufman, Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 08:44:19 -0700
Regarding the “upside down man”, as Nick’s plot shows, when flipped, the Korttajarvi series has little impact on the overall reconstructions. Also, the series was not included in the calibration. Nonetheless, it’s unfortunate that I flipped the Korttajarvi data. We used the density data as the temperature proxy, as recommended to me by Antii Ojala (co-author of the original work). It’s weakly inversely related to organic matter content. I should have used the inverse of density as the temperature proxy. I probably got confused by the fact that the 20th century shows very high density values and I inadvertently equated that directly with temperature.

From: Keith Briffa, Date: Sun Apr 29 19:53:16 2007
I tried hard to balance the needs of the science and the IPCC , which were not always the same. I worried that you might think I gave the impression of not supporting you well enough while trying to report on the issues and uncertainties . Much had to be removed and I was particularly unhappy that I could not get the statement into the SPM regarding the AR4 reinforcement of the results and conclusions of the TAR. I tried my best but we were basically railroaded by Susan.

Fixing the data

From: Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 08:44:19 -0700
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.

From: Tom Wigley, Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
So, if we could reduce the ocean blip by, say, 0.15 degC, then this would be significant for the global mean – but we’d still have to explain the land blip. I’ve chosen 0.15 here deliberately. This still leaves an ocean blip, and i think one needs to have some form of ocean blip to explain the land blip (via either some common forcing, or ocean forcing land, or vice versa, or all of these).

From: Tom Crowley, Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:13:28 -0400
I have been fiddling with the best way to illustrate the stable nature of the medieval warm period – the attached plot has eight sites that go from 946-1960

From: Gary Funkhouser, Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 15:37:09 -0700
I really wish I could be more positive about the Kyrgyzstan material, but I swear I pulled every trick out of my sleeve trying to milk something out of that. (…) I don’t think it’d be productive to try and juggle the chronology statistics any more than I already have – they just are what they are (that does sound Graybillian.

From: Keith Briffa, Date: Wed Sep 22 16:19:06 1999
I know there is pressure to present a nice tidy story as regards ‘apparent unprecedented warming in a thousand years or more in the proxy data’ but in reality the situation is not quite so simple. We don’t have a lot of proxies that come right up to date and those that do (at least a significant number of tree proxies ) some unexpected changes in response that do not match the recent warming.

From: ????
Another serious issue to be considered relates to the fact that the PC1 time series in the Mann et al. analysis was adjusted to reduce the positive slope in the last 150 years (on the assumption – following an earlier paper by Lamarche et al. – that this incressing growth was evidence of carbon dioxide fertilization) , by differencing the data from another record produced by other workers in northern Alaska and Canada (which incidentally was standardised in a totally different way). This last adjustment obviously will have a large influence on the quantification of the link between these Western US trees and N.Hemisphere temperatures. At this point, it is fair to say that this adjustment was arbitrary and the link between Bristlecone pine growth and CO2 is , at the very least, arguable.

From: Michael E. Mann, Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 10:17:57 -0400
Phil and I have recently submitted a paper using about a dozen NH records that fit this category, and many of which are available nearly 2K back–I think that trying to adopt a timeframe of 2K, rather than the usual 1K, addresses a good earlier point that Peck made w/ regard to the memo, that it would be nice to try to “contain” the putative “MWP”, even if we don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back

From: Phil Jones, Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 13:04:24 +0000
As all our (Mike, Tom and CRU) all show that the first few centuries of the millennium were cooler than the 20th century, we will come in for some flak from the skeptics saying we’re wrong because everyone knows it was warmer in the Medieval period. We can show why we believe we are correct with independent data from glacial advances and even slower responding proxies, however, what are the chances of putting together a group of a very few borhole series that are deep enough to get the last 1000 years. Basically trying to head off criticisms of the IPCC chapter, but good science in that we will be rewriting people’s perceived wisdom about the course of temperature change over the past millennium.

Deleting the data

From: Phil Jones, Date: Mon Feb 21 16:28:32 2005
The skeptics seem to be building up a head of steam here ! Maybe we can use this to our advantage to get the series updated ! Odd idea to update the proxies with satellite estimates of the lower troposphere rather than surface data !. Odder still that they don’t realise that Moberg et al used the Jones and Moberg updated series ! Francis Zwiers is till onside. He said that PC1s produce hockey sticks. He stressed that the late 20th century is the warmest of the millennium, but Regaldo didn’t bother with that. Also ignored Francis’ comment about all the other series looking similar to MBH. The IPCC comes in for a lot of stick. Leave it to you to delete as appropriate!

From: Phil Jones, 2/2/2005 09:41 AM
The two MMs have been after the CRU station data for years. If they ever hear there is a Freedom of Information Act now in the UK, I think I’ll delete the file rather than send to anyone.

From: Phil Jones, Date: Thu May 29 11:04:11 2008
Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis. Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address. We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.

From: Phil Jones, Date: Fri Jan 16 13:25:59 2004
This is for YOURS EYES ONLY. Delete after reading – please ! I’m trying to redress the balance. One reply from Pfister said you should make all available !! Pot calling the kettle black – Christian doesn’t make his methods available. I replied to the wrong Christian message so you don’t get to see what he said. Probably best. Told Steve separately and to get more advice from a few others as well as Kluwer and legal. PLEASE DELETE – just for you, not even Ray and Malcolm

Wrongdoing

From: Phil Jones, Date: Mon Feb 21 16:28:32 2005
I’m getting hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU station temperature data. Don’t any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a Freedom of Information Act !

From: Michael E. Mann, Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 09:05:47 -0400
It is true that the skeptics twist the truth clockwise rather than counterclockwise in the Southern Hemisphere? There was indeed a lot of activity last week. Hans Von Storch’s resignation as chief editor of CR, which I think took a lot of guts, couldn’t have come at a better time. (..) It was on the night before before the notorious “James Inhofe”, Chair of the Senate “Environment and Public Works Committee” attempted to provide a public stage for Willie Soon and David Legates to peddle their garbage (…) Fortunately, these two are clowns, neither remotely as sharp as Lindzen or as slick as Michaels, and it wasn’t too difficult to deal with them. Suffice it to say, the event did *not* go the way Inhofe and the republicans had hoped. The democrats, conveniently, had received word of Hans’ resignation, but the republicans and Soon/Legates had not.

From: Phil Jones, Date: Tue Jul 5 15:51:55 2005
If anything, I would like to see the climate change happen, so the science could be proved right, regardless of the consequences. This isn’t being political, it is being selfish.

From: Ben Santer, Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:07:56 -0700
Next time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat the crap out of him. Very tempted.

Hiding information

From: Michael E. Mann, Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:51:53 -0500
Anyway, I wanted you guys to know that you’re free to use RC in any way you think would be helpful. Gavin and I are going to be careful about what comments we screen through, and we’ll be very careful to answer any questions that come up to any extent we can. On the other hand, you might want to visit the thread and post replies yourself. We can hold comments up in the queue and contact you about whether or not you think they should be screened through or not, and if so, any comments you’d like us to include.

From: Michael E. Mann, Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:18:24 -0400
Attached are the calibration residual series for experiments based on available networks back to:
AD 1000
AD 1400
AD 1600
(…) But basically, you’ll see that the residuals are pretty red for the first 2 cases, and then not significantly red for the 3rd case–its even a bit better for the AD 1700 and 1820 cases, but I can’t seem to dig them up. (…) p.s. I know I probably don’t need to mention this, but just to insure absolutely clarify on this, I’m providing these for your own personal use, since you’re a trusted colleague. So please don’t pass this along to others without checking w/ me first. This is the sort of “dirty laundry” one doesn’t want to fall into the hands of those who might potentially try to distort things…

From: Phil Jones, Date:Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:30 AM
You likely know that McIntyre will check this one to make sure it hasn’t changed since the IPCC close-off date July 2006! Hard copies of the WG1 report from CUP have arrived here today. Ammann/Wahl – try and change the Received date! Don’t give those skeptics something to amuse themselves with.

From: Phil Jones, before 19/06/03 12:33 -0400
Keith and I have discussed the email below. I don’t want to start a discussion of it and I don’t want you sending it around to anyone else, but it serves as a warning as to where the debate might go should the EOS piece come out.

From: Phil Jones, Date: Mon Feb 9 09:23:43 2004
I hid behind the fact that some of the data had been received from individuals and not directly from Met Services through the Global Telecommunications Service (GTS) or through GCOS.

From: Phil Jones, Date: Wed Aug 20 09:32:52 2008
Keith/Tim still getting FOI requests as well as MOHC and Reading. All our FOI officers have been in discussions and are now using the same exceptions not to respond – advice they got from the Information Commissioner. (…) The FOI line we’re all using is this. IPCC is exempt from any countries FOI – the skeptics have been told this. Even though we (MOHC, CRU/UEA) possibly hold relevant info the IPCC is not part our remit (mission statement, aims etc) therefore we don’t have an obligation to pass it on.

From: Phil Jones, Date: Fri Jan 21 15:20:06 2005
If FOIA does ever get used by anyone, there is also IPR to consider as well. Data is covered by all the agreements we sign with people, so I will be hiding behind them.

Peer-review interference

From: Tom Wigley, Date: 1/20/2005 04:30 PM
If you think that Saiers is in the greenhouse skeptics camp, then, if we can find documentary evidence of this, we could go through official AGU channels to get him ousted.

From: Phil Jones, Date: Fri Aug 13 13:38:32 2004
I’d rather you didn’t. I think it should be sufficient to forward the para from Andrew Conrie’s email that says the paper has been rejected by all 3 reviewers. You can say that the paper was an extended and updated version of that which appeared in CR. Obviously, under no circumstances should any of this get back to Pielke.

From: Michael E. Mann, Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 08:14:49 -0500
This was the danger of always criticising the skeptics for not publishing in the “peer-reviewed literature”. Obviously, they found a solution to that–take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering “Climate Research” as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…

From: Edward Cook, Date: 6/4/03 09:50 AM -0400
I got a paper to review (submitted to the Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Sciences), written by a Korean guy and someone from Berkeley, that claims that the method of reconstruction that we use in dendroclimatology (reverse regression) is wrong, biased, lousy, horrible, etc. They use your Tornetrask recon as the main whipping boy. (…) If published as is, this paper could really do some damage. It is also an ugly paper to review because it is rather mathematical, with a lot of Box-Jenkins stuff in it. It won’t be easy to dismiss out of hand as the math appears to be correct theoretically (…) I am really sorry but I have to nag about that review – Confidentially I now need a hard and if required extensive case for rejecting – to support Dave Stahle’s and really as soon as you can. Please

From: Tom Wigley, Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:17:29 -0600
Mike’s idea to get editorial board members to resign will probably not work — must get rid of von Storch too, otherwise holes will eventually fill up with people like Legates, Balling, Lindzen, Michaels, Singer, etc. I have heard that the publishers are not happy with von Storch, so the above approach might remove that hurdle too.

From: Phil Jones, Date: Thu Mar 19 17:02:53 2009
I’m having a dispute with the new editor of Weather. I’ve complained about him to the RMS Chief Exec. If I don’t get him to back down, I won’t be sending any more papers to any RMS journals and I’ll be resigning from the RMS.

From: Benjamin D. Santer, Date: 19/03/2009 16:48
If the RMS is going to require authors to make ALL data available – raw data PLUS results from all intermediate calculations – I will not submit any further papers to RMS journals.

From: Phil Jones, Date: Thu Jul 8 16:30:16 2004
I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!

Financial practices

From: Andrew Manning, Date: 06/10/2009 00:13
is this another witch hunt (like Mann et al.)? How should I respond to the below? (I’m in the process of trying to persuade Siemens Corp. (a company with half a million employees in 190 countries!) to donate me a little cash to do some CO2 measurments here in the UK – looking promising, so the last thing I need is news articles calling into question (again) observed temperature increases – I thought we’d moved the debate beyond this, but seems that these sceptics are real die-hards!!).

From: Tatiana M. Dedkova, Date: Thu, 7 Mar 96 09:41:07 +0500
Also, it is important for us if you can transfer the ADVANCE money on the personal accounts which we gave you earlier and the sum for one occasion transfer (for example, during one day) will not be more than 10,000 USD. Only in this case we can avoid big taxes and use money for our work as much as possible.

From: Phil Jones, before 19/06/03 12:33 -0400There are also some snipes at CRU and our funding, but we’re ignoring these here. Also Mike comes in for some stick, so stay cool Mike – you’re a married man now ! So let’s keep this amongst ourselves . (…) I say this as this might come out if things get nasty.

From: Mick Kelly, Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 14:17:15
NOAA want to give us more money for the El Nino work with IGCN. How much do we have left from the last budget? I reckon most has been spent but we need to show some left to cover the costs of the trip Roger didn’t make and also the fees/equipment/computer money we haven’t spent otherwise NOAA will be suspicious. Politically this money may have to go through Simon’s institute but there overhead rate is high so maybe not!

The head of the Inter-Goverment Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) has come out and said this doesn’t make a difference.  It’s a couple of rogue scientists that’s all.  Really?  Phil Jones has contributed how much of the information that the IPCC published in their report?  Phil Jones wrote all of the historical data obtained from the past.  Now, that being said, how can we be sure he didn’t cook the historical data so it would exaggerate the warming?  Here’s some food for thought.  If Phil Jones hadn’t doctored the data would we still be having this conversation?  Would the man-made global warming be an issue right now?  Maybe not, but we may really never know. 

The email conversations are damning enough but now, at American Thinker, a computer programmer got ahold of the code for the computer models.  He had some very damning words to describe the code global warming alarmists are using to try to predict the doom and gloom of man-made global warming.  You can read that excellent article here.

Another interesting thing is that the guy who is in charge of the IPCC is not a climateologist.  That’s absolutely right, the guy in charge of the IPCC has a degree in economics.  Now why would the IPCC, who studies global warming, have a head person as a economist?  I can answer that.  They have him there so he can redistribute our wealth under the world governing body at the UN.  That tidbit should make you think about the plans that the UN governing body has for the US and why we should pay for an obvious fraudelent theory.

I’m willing to bet anyone money that the procrastinator in chief will ignore all of the emails until he’s forced to .  I’m betting that when the truth comes out during the Senator Inhoffe investigation into the scientists and all treaties and legislation pertaining to man-made global warming are shot down, Obama will attempt to ignore the facts and still pass these toxic policies. 

In closing, I’d like any members of the lame street media to understand me to a T.  I don’t give a sh*t about Tiger Wood’s wreck and/or his fooling around on his wife, it’s none of my business.  I DO CARE about being bilked in the name of a theory that is total manufactured non-scientific bullshit!  There used to be a time when the media represented it’s customers.  Now every reporter seems to have a thrill going up his leg when he talks about the liberal messiah and his bullshit beliefs.

Finally, a voice of reason is going to look into the hacked emails from Dr. Phil Jones.  I’ve said if the science is settled then why even go down this path of manipulating data?  Of course even I can figure out the science has not been settled and they did these dishonest things to hide the fact that the science has not been settled.

Ed Bagley, Jr., even though he’s a lot misguided on the subject, I actually respect him a little.  He’s definitely not like that idiot Al Gore in that he lives as close to carbon neutral lifestyle as possible.  However, he’s put a lot of misguided faith in the so-called consensus than I do.  I’m sure the mafia has a conscensus among it’s members too.  Anytime you have a group of like minded individuals that believe in the same thing, they will always have a consensus.  In this case the group’s interests are fraudelent in that the science did not lead them to the conclussion.  They had the conclussion BEFORE they had the science and adjusted the science to meet their ill-proven conclussion.

Senator Inhofe is going to call in all of those other scientists to discuss the emails because the emails are very damning.  I support Senator Inhoffe’s endeavor.  If I’m going to have to pay for crap and tax then I want to make sure that man-made global warming wasn’t man-made by dishonest means…by dishonest scientists manipulating data.  Congress owes, we the people, that much

Ok, I am so damn tired of this politically correct bullshit.  Last time I checked Iraq is a war zone.  Honestly, Ahmed Hashim Abed got a fat lip out of the operation.  So what, big deal.  He’s lucky he didn’t get a hole in the head instead.  In case your not sure why he was a High Value Target, Ahmed was responsible for killing black water employees and dragging some of the bodies through the town and he hanged some off a bridge over the Euphrates river.

Honestly, if this terrorist POS got the fat lip while being taken into custody big deal!  If he was handcuffed and under physical control when he received it then even I may have a problem with it.  Right now details are kind of sketchy because all we know is that members of the SEAL team are facing court martial proceedings because they refused Admiral’s Mast.

However, just picture a scene on cops where the cops rush into a building to arrest someone and sometimes they have to get rough in the arrest because someone didn’t want to be taken into custody.  It’s very possible this POS resisted and got punched in the face for his efforts.  There is nothing criminal about that. 

This reminds me of the sniper that shot the bombmaker for Al Quaeda and were tried in a courtmartial 2 times and found innocent all while some dumbass general, whom I hope was forced to retire, was screaming it was murder.  Things can always go bad when attempting to capture one of these Islamic POS’s.  You can’t blame the soldiers for every little thing that happened while they were attempting to catch someone alive because the message your sending is that we’d have rather you died so that we could catch this POS.  He could have very easily been killed in the struggle and I’m cool with that.  If it comes down to our troops and a terrorist POS, I expect our soldiers to take out the terrorist.

It’s funny how the so-called smartest man in America is ignoring the exposed lies and corruption within the man-made global warming arena.  He’s continuing his committment to the scam.  That doesn’t make him the smartest man in America, it makes him dumb.  This is the singularly the worst fraud committed in decades and he’s ignoring the truth.  This is why I say liberalism is not based on truth because if it was, the liberal messiah would attempt to put some distance between himself and the fraudsters and demand some answers.  Clearly, he is not.

The media has shown their true colors.  They are more than willing to editorialize Sarah Palin’s hacked emails but not so much hacked emails that prove man-made global warming scientists are the fraudelent criminals I’ve always said they were.  No wonder papers are going under and news outlets are rarely watched.  The lame street media are willing to prepetuate lies instead of publishing the truth.  I guess the truth doesn’t sell papers like it used to.  However, I don’t suggest anyone hack anyones emails because that is a crime but fair is fair.  If it is ok to hack Sarah Palin’s emails then it should be equally ok for someone to hack a global nutcase’s email.  The left can be so hypocritical when it comes to such things.

Even that waste of a good life, Al Gore, is still running around attempting to say that man-made global warming is still a problem.  The IPCC is set to give us another 10-year warning because their last 10-year warning didn’t happen.  Think about that, in 1989 they gave us a 10-year warning.  Very little of their so-called gloom and doom outlook has actually happened in the last 10 years.  In fact, inside one of the emails contains a scientists thoughts that we can’t prove why it’s not warming.  Nobody in the media are attempting to get Al Gore’s comments on this situation.  This does not surprise me because REAL journalism is deader than Ted Kennedy.  In the old days, the media would be all over this like white on rice.

You can read the hacked emails here.  Man-made global warming is about as real as pro-wrestling.  Man-made global warming is indeed man-made through scientists lying about the temps and manipulating the temps to hide the cooling. 

The only scientists that deserve respect are the ones that have been questioning the science because they did so in pursuit of the truth.  They didn’t have to manipulate data to prove their point.  They acted honestly and were honest in their approach.  The rest that perpetuated the fraudelent science based on manipulated data, lied about documents that they deleted, etc, deserve absolutely no respect.  In fact, they deserve to go to jail for fraud.

The global warming nuts are out there saying all of these emails are being taken out of context but they can’t tell us exactly which emails are being taken out of context and how they are being taken out of context.  Last time I checked admission of deleting documents to keep them out of the hands of deniers is basically a criminal act.  How can I take that out of context?  They are being dishonest because they hope this will blow over fast so they can get some more tax money for more fraudelent research.  Of course the so-called smartest man in America is going to give them more money because he needs global warming to be true so he can continue with his plans to finish raping our wallets and ruining our economy.

A lawyer who represents all of the 9/11 defendents says his clients intend on using the court venue to say why they committed mass murder on September 11th, 2001.  They are using the venue to argue that it is our foreign policy that caused 9/11.  They are also set to plead innocent to the murder of 3,000 people.  Eric Holder made the decision to hold these trials in New York City.

First and foremost, the prosecutor needs to shut this madness down and keep the facts into the confounds of the proceedings.  The courtroom is not a place to discuss foreign policy.  It’s where people plead guity or innocent and prove their innocence not attempt to justify their madness.  I still stand by my original assessment that this is the most idiotic decision that I’ve ever heard of. 

Really?  I don’t give a crap why they did it, I just want the court proceedings to stay on course.  The basic questions need to be asked….did you kill 3,000 people on 9/11, are you guilty or innocent.  If you are innocent, offer me some proof.  US foreign policy is NOT a appropriate reason why you are innocent.

Again, Khalid Shekh Mohommed has already pleaded guity in a military tribunnal and now we’re giving him an opportunity to create a circus atmosphere in New York and I want to know why?  As the poor bastard that is funding said circus, I believe I have a right to know why I’m being forced to pay for the circus.  It is accepted knowledge that he and the rest of the morons will probably get a squishy liberal judge who will allow these morons to get on the stand and say anything they want.  Let’s face it, they all want to hear how George W. Bush created the problem in the 8 months of his presidency.  Although this problem existed back all the way through Slick Willy’s 8 years in office.  They have no problem discounting slick willy as a cause of this even though throughout his whole presidency they attacked us and we did absolutely nothing but bombed a training camp that they did not use anymore.  Bill Clinton got accused of using it as a diversionary tactic because during all of the other attacks he did nothing and hind site being what it is, maybe slick willy grew a backbone and was doing the right thing for once but his timing was in the middle of the sex scandel.  If he’d have retaliated after all of the attacks, nobody would have questioned him.

Again, this is living up to all of the hype because you betcha it is now officially a circus.  Thanks Eric Holder (I’m being sarcastic not that I’m actually thanking Eric for making a idiotic decision).

Wow, this came up out of the blue.  Apparently what has happened is that someone hacked into a couple of pro Global Warming organizations and found some information that Al Gore does not want you to see.  Supposedly, this stuff shows how they have fought to keep information from the Freedom of Information requests that prove Global Warming is not happening.  They have changed temperature data to prove that global warming is a serious problem.  Does this really surprise anyone? 

I think that these scientists should really lose all credibility and credentials for being lying pieces of sh*t.  They should be ruined professionally and prevented from ever being a scientist again nor should they be able to take a lessor job in the scientific community.  However, this probably won’t happen but it really should.  I’m tired of dishonest scientists trying to govern my life and how I live it.   It should be MY decision on how I want to live my life and my finances should govern what I do…Not some dishonest scientist who are inflating temps for the purpose of deception.  Yes, Al Gore can kiss every inch of my big fat @ss.

Again, I’ve been told how I am part of the problem since I refuse to agree with the idiots.  Really, if there was a legitamite problem, would scientist have to inflate temps and use dishonest methods?  Absolutely not if it were real.  I have never done anything special for earth day.  In fact, I’ve left every light on in my house and went to work and had all of those lights on too each earth day.  I guess this makes me much smarter than 99% of liberals who believe this crap.  This even makes me 100% smarter than Barak Huisane Obama.  Wow, to think that I didn’t even go to Harvard.

Peer reviewed means absolutely nothing.  Peer reviewed just means this is a group conspiracy to bilk the country of all of it’s money and ruin it with such idiotic programs as Cap and Tax.  Again, if this was a legitimate theory then why would numbers have to be inflated and why would they have to use so much deception?  This is easy!  Because I’ve called it the Man-made Global Warming Scam.  It’s a scam for the suckers and the idiots.  Al Gore has the mentality of a snake oil salesman.

Even though this has been the coolest year for the US, Al Gore is out there saying that we are warming.  Really Al?  Ya think?  I’m sorry, most of us have had to wear warmer clothes this year because of the “warming!”  If Al is smart, he’ll get rid of his stocks and investments based on green things and start advocating that global warming does not exist.  That way he won’t wind up eating macaroni and cheese because his house of cards are coming down as this crap is exposed.  It’s hard to advocate global warming when we have emails from these so-called “Scientists” engaging in dishonest reporting to prove their stupid theory.

Again, most of what Al Gore said would happen, has not happened nor is it close to happen.  Why don’t the AP pull people from fact checking Sarah Palin and have them fact check the hypocrite Al Gore? 

To see the level of dishonesty of what they’ve found on these websites, click here.  Again, these are hacked emails that show the level of dishonesty in the global warming movement and how they worked to keep the real data from the public who have a right to see the real data.  I think this is a abomination and I think said scientists should have their credentials revoked for their dishonesty.  They should also be tried on fraud charges and have all monies that they have been given for research  stripped and I also think they should be sued for money that they have gotten and spent.