I just love how the hits keep coming on the man-made global warming front.  The IPCC is a useless organization which has a problem telling the truth 99% of the time.  How many times do the IPCC get a pass when they get caught lying?  At what point does the seriously brain-dead decide everything this branch of the UN says is bullshit?

Scientists in Bangladesh say their country will not disappear under the waves.  The scientists, Dhaka-based Center for Environment and Geographic Information Services (CEGIS), say the IPCC’s prediction was bogus because they have 1 billion tons of sediment that will prevent any rises in their water levels.  This proves that the man-made global warming crowd won’t let the truth get in the way of their fantasy.  CEGIS director Maminul Haque Sarker told AFP that “studies on the effects of climate change in Bangladesh, including those quoted by the IPCC, did not consider the role of sediment in the growth and adjustment process of the country’s coast and rivers to the sea level rise.” Even if sea levels rose according to IPCC predictions, Sarker says, natural sediment deposits would cancel the effect of any rise.

Apocalyptic changes forecast by climate change alarmists, according to Swedish geologist and physicist Nils-Axel Morner, former head of the International Commission on Sea Level Change, are not in the cards. Despite fluctuations down as well as up, “the sea is not rising,” he says. “It hasn’t risen in 50 years.”  Six times he and his expert team visited the Maldive Islands to confirm that the sea has not risen for half a century. Similarly in Tuvalu, where local leaders have been calling for the inhabitants to be evacuated for 20 years, the sea has, if anything, dropped in recent decades. Venice, Italy, has been sinking rather than the Adriatic rising, says Dr. Morner.  I had a young lady come on my site and swear to me that the maldives were almost underwater.  This proves she is a usefull idiot.  She will say whatever the global nut farm tells her to say.

The IPCC has gotten caught putting student term papers into their report and claimed they were peer reviewed.  Nice try but I call bullshit on that.  They also attempted to put greenpeace activist articles in their report.  The activist was not a scientist so I’m not sure how the IPCC can claim they have credibility.

IPCC Chairman Rajendra Pachauri defended his organization’s predictions by warning that “on the basis of one study one cannot jump to conclusions.” Yet he and the IPCC jumped to the conclusion that Himalayan glaciers would disappear by 2035 based on unsubstantiated student theses and anecdotes from a magazine for mountain climbers. These claims have been withdrawn amid much laughter.

What about the Netherlands mentioned in the IPCC report?  The report said that the Netherlands are 55% below sea level yet the truth is it’s only 26%.  Wow, they doubled the actual number.  How is it that the UN’s IPCC still has any credibility what so ever in this debate?

Meanwhile, Mann is whining to the press about the death threats and non-believers.  All I really have to say to Mann is how dishonest it is that he selected a tree that has been found to be unrealiable at best to get his hockey stick graph.  Tell me how it is that back in the 80’s and 90’s there were 6,000 temperature monitoring stations and tell me how you narrowed that down to a just a fraction of that to monitor the world’s temperature?  My thoughts are you guys were trying to cook the books to make a case for warming.  Russian scientist have stated that you guys omitted the data from stations in the coldest regions of Russia.  Let’s be clear here Mann, the debate is far from over.  Both you and the IPCC have proved that you have no integrity nor morals.  Apparently, you guys haven’t been honest about your work and love to hate on the deniers instead of showing off your work and making them believers.   Instead you dishonestly refused to honor FOIA requests by claiming your dog ate your supporting documents.

Still, Pachauri persists in his fables. “One single error doesn’t take anything away from the major findings of the report,” he said. “The fact is that the glaciers are melting.” At least the glaciers in Iceland are, due to natural forces, namely volcanic activity. Even if real, not everything can be blamed on man.