http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_JJLLfTR8I&feature=related
These voters should thank god that breathing doesn’t require intelligence.
Advertisements
Your Average Obama Voters – This Is Really Sad
March 21, 2012
lonniewalker
Categories: Communists, Daily Kos (Kooks), Democrat, Idiot, Lame Street Media, Liberal Media, Liberals, Marxist, move-on org, No Class, Obama, Politics, Socialists
60 responses to “Your Average Obama Voters – This Is Really Sad”
Ben Hoffman
March 21st, 2012 at 22:52
Interview right-wingers and you’d get even dumber answers. A lot of those morons probably think the sun revolves around the earth, which they think is flat. And here’s something really stupid… Get this… A lot of them think some guy 2,000 years ago was born to a virgin mother and was resurrected three days after he died! Can you believe there are people that stupid?!! And they vote!!! It’s no wonder our country is so screwed up.
lonniewalker
April 4th, 2012 at 18:27
What’s that sound? Oh yeah that’s just the bubble that you’ve been living in popping. There is a NEW study out that disputes claims made by the scientist as the basis for their belief. Now that stack of turds got wet the whole thing falls apart. The short version is posted below. If they use any words your not familiar with just let me know and I’ll explain them for you. LOL.
“Skeptics of manmade global warming claims can bolster their position with a new study showing that the Earth went through a previous warming period not caused by human CO2 emissions.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has argued that the Medieval Warm Period approximately 500 to 1,000 years ago was confined to Europe and did not affect the entire planet, “which means the worldwide warming we’re experiencing now is a manmade phenomenon,” the Daily Mail observed.
But a team of scientists led by geochemist Zunli Lu from Syracuse University in New York found the warming was not confined to Europe and actually extended all the way down to Antarctica, affecting the entire planet. The finding indicates that “the Earth has already experienced global warming without the aid of human CO2 emissions,” according to the Mail.
Following that period, the Earth cooled down naturally and there was even a “mini ice age.”
Professor Lu’s study — published in the journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters — relies on a rare mineral called ikaite, an icy version of limestone that forms in cold waters. The water that holds crystals of ikaite together traps information about temperatures present when the crystals were formed.
Lu’s team studied ikaite crystals from sediment cores drilled off the coast of Antarctica, and the crystals showed that the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age extended to Antarctica.
The Mail observed: “Is this finally proof we’re not causing global warming?” ”
Well I’ll be damned. So what’s next? Your going to tell me that this scientist is ignorant?
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
April 4th, 2012 at 20:40
You’re a liar, Lonnie. Plain and simple. Here is professor Lu’s response to right-wingers misrepresenting his findings.
How can you live with yourself as a pathological liar? Don’t you care what your children think of you?
lonniewalker
April 4th, 2012 at 20:47
LMFAO, Hey, I posted the article. Basically the point is that they did have MWP temperatures in north america. Isn’t that one of the things that climate scientists denied? Lonnie
________________________________
Ben Hoffman
April 4th, 2012 at 20:51
Antarctica is not in North America.
You are a liar for posting lies as fact. As the scientist states: “Our study does not question the well-established anthropogenic warming trend.”
lonniewalker
April 4th, 2012 at 21:02
i posted an article. Anyways, you’ve never really commented on whether or not Michael Mann’s hockey stick chart is a fact? Because it attempts to down play the MWP and the test was flawed because of it. I view it as Michael Mann has no scientific integrity.
________________________________
lonniewalker
April 4th, 2012 at 21:37
This is the stuff that makes you guys look like idiots.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidferris/2012/03/31/is-climate-change-a-mental-health-emergency/
People are out there saying idiotic stuff like that and telling us man-made global warming will increase the number of rapes. I can hear the rapists now saying they didn’t want to rape that girl but the weather made them do it.
Lonnie
________________________________
lonniewalker
April 4th, 2012 at 21:52
Point taken. Still refuse to mention your buddy Michael Mann’s hockey stick chart eh. Well I did find this article which is revelent.
http://www.climatedepot.com/a/9035/SPECIAL-REPORT-More-Than-1000-International-Scientists-Dissent-Over-ManMade-Global-Warming-Claims–Challenge-UN-IPCC–Gore
Lonnie
________________________________
Ben Hoffman
April 4th, 2012 at 21:46
No, it makes you look like an idiot, possibly the result of your lobotomy.
lonniewalker
March 22nd, 2012 at 21:09
Ben, apparently you have the disease known as angry liberal syndrome. You probably spend all day worrying over other people’s religion. If you don’t believe in any kind of religion, that’s fine. Why does everyone’s religious beliefs bother you? I can beat that just by pointing to Al Gore and the warmists. They’ve lied just about on everything they’ve released as evidence of man-made global warming yet suckers like you eat that stuff up like it was hotcakes….don’t you?
Ben Hoffman
March 23rd, 2012 at 00:07
Nope, you right-wingers have been scientifically proven to be more emotional than normal people. You’re outraged over something new every day — most of which is fabricated.
lonniewalker
March 23rd, 2012 at 01:31
Liberals are much more emotional about things. Remember it wasn’t right wingers at the Occupy protests defecating and urinating on the streets. The cities didn’t have to spend a ton of money on the Tea Party members…just the liberals. They needed more cops on the street to control you guys. Then when the Occupyers left, they left their garbage all over the place. Also there were no confrontations with police at the Tea Party protests and well the Occupyer’s are all over youtube claiming they were abused by the cops. Sorry you struck out again.
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 23rd, 2012 at 11:14
Oh, yeah… I forgot… you right-wingers don’t value science. You also don’t value logic. Being sloppy is not the same as being emotional.
lonniewalker
March 23rd, 2012 at 12:05
Really? As I recall leftists don’t value science either. Scientists have said that nuclear energy is perfectly safe but as I recall leftists had a uncontrollable bowel movement when they saw the movie the china syndrome. Man-made global warming is based on fabricated data and a bunch of scientists that don’t have an ounce of integrity. They’ve been caught red handed massaging the data and still idiots are out there swearing it’s true. Talk about useful idiots. As far as liberals not being emotional, please watch this video and tell me this isn’t emotional. As usual, you prove your liberalism by lying.
http://www.tmz.com/2012/03/18/jason-russell-video-naked-meltdown-kony/?adid=hero3
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 24th, 2012 at 01:08
Scientists have said that nuclear energy is perfectly safe
That’s a lie. You can’t cite a single scientist who makes that claim because you’re LYING. And the scientists you’re whining about were discussing how to deal with idiot right-wingers. Nothing they wrote in the emails affects their credibility in the least. There are only two or three legitimate scientists in the WORLD who don’t believe man made pollution is contributing to global warming. All the rest have a political agenda or are tied to the oil industry. Face it… You’re a liar, plain and simple. But it’s okay since Jesus died for your sins.
lonniewalker
March 24th, 2012 at 08:42
Ok, if I’m lying then why do they use nuclear energy in Europe? You know, the place where all you liberals attempt to make this country more like. I wasn’t even referring to the damn climategate emails. How about Michael Mann’s hockey stick chart? We all know the Medieval Warming Period happened. It’s well documented. Mann used a tree that almost every climate scientist says gives a false reading. So Mann attempted to re-write history and wipe out the MWP by claiming it was cooler than it actually was during that time frame. Oh yeah and that chart was the lead slide on all of the climate discussions.
How about Sattelitegate: http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=6419&linkbox=true&position=1
Temperaturegate: http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2010/09/25/thermometer-magic/
Oh wait, don’t forget these scandelous events either: http://notrickszone.com/2010/08/03/climate-scandals-list-of-94-climate-gates/
Oh more gates: http://www.ocregister.com/articles/-234092–.html
Here’s an article discussing Peer Review and what it means.
http://iwantanewleft.typepad.com/i-want-a-new-left/2010/06/global-warming-and-peer-review.html
Tom Smitheringale’s trip to the arctic. Apparently, he was attempting to prove man-made global warming was real and had to be rescued because he’s an idiot!
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/another-polar-rescue-must-send/story-e6frfhqf-1225856131380
Also let’s not forget the man-made global warming cruise that had to be evacuated because they hit an iceberg. That one is always good for a laugh. I guess they found their melting iceberg.
Honestly, I haven’t seen a scientific theory surrounded by nothing but lies that was ever proved to be true. Not to mention the fact that when we bust one of their it’s supposed to happen by this year predictions, they roll it forward again. They even had a team go out to the Maldives to measure the water and there has been no massive increase in water levels. So nothing every mentioned in “An Inconvenient Truth” has happened. The top 5 hotest summers ever is stil in the 1930’s.
Lonnie
lonniewalker
March 24th, 2012 at 09:22
Here is a scientist talking about nuclear energy and the scare campaign against it.
I guess I wasn’t lying but you were. A liberal like you couldn’t tell the truth if their tongue were notarized.
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 24th, 2012 at 15:05
Dr. Bill Wattenburg is an idiot. Exposure to radiation is extremely dangerous and usually kills the person exposed. Why don’t you volunteer to have it buried in your backyard if it’s so safe? Or how about at the edge of your city? No, I didn’t think so.
lonniewalker
March 24th, 2012 at 09:27
lonniewalker
March 24th, 2012 at 09:50
lonniewalker
March 24th, 2012 at 15:47
Oh come on!!! Even the global nut’s hero …. Hansen from NASA says we should get onto nuclear power. Na that’s alright because I already have you idiot’s windmills all over my backyard. Time for you guys to sacrifice something for a change. I think it’s funny how that idiot Ted Kennedy can come down to my backyard and praise wind power and then turn around and file an injunction when it comes to putting this shitty technology in his backyard. Oh let’s not forget about the nuts in California who say they want alternative energy but yet when they try to put solar panels in the desert they threw a fit because wildlife might crawl ontop of them and fry themselves. So on one hand your saying you want alternative energy on the other, you don’t like the alternatives that exist. Tough shit, it’s all that’s available.
Lonnie
lonniewalker
March 24th, 2012 at 15:55
So you are at war with science then. Thanks for cleaing it up. Your rather believe in the man-made global warming theory because it’s science is based on lies and deception and disreguard a scientist like Dr. Wattenberg’s scientific opinion. Yeah that makes perfect sense if your a liberal.
Lonnie
lonniewalker
March 24th, 2012 at 16:09
Of course don’t take my word for it. Listen to YOUR messiah’s man in charge of energy speak on nuclear energy.
lonniewalker
March 25th, 2012 at 22:18
Woo Hoo Ben, Where’d ya go? I can’t help but notice you never denied the lies and deception involved in YOUR religion of man-made global warming. I guess your religion has as many kinks in the armor as the Christian faith. It really doesn’t matter if the stories in the bible add up, the bigger picture is it gives people a moral compass to do what’s right throughout their life. Your religion is outright sad. Lying about the so called data is wrong on many levels
A scientist is called a scientist because he uses science to prove his point. A scientist doesn’t uses any tricks with numbers to prove his point because then it isn’t science anymore. Michael Mann should be charged with fraud and have his career ruined because of his manipulation of the data but people like you who drink the koolaid will always write him a pass. His tree ring data was a dishonest attempt to make the inconvienent truth about the Medieval Warming Period cooler than it was so he could say that the 90’s was hotter. That makes you a useful idiot. I have to call things as I see them.
Then there are the others who run about saying man-made global warming will result in rapes. Really? They are over exaggerating things trying to force the other useful idiots (Democrat politicians) make rash decisions based on unjustifiable threats.
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 26th, 2012 at 00:40
Lonnie, you’re a moron.
lonniewalker
March 29th, 2012 at 12:20
Ben,
Let’s approach this from a different angle. If climate scientists are basing their findings on science, then why do they wet their pants when people put in a FOIA request to look at their work? Why is the UN making plans to deny any and all FOIA requests? Why are scientists using yahoo accounts to discuss their work?
Lonnie
lonniewalker
March 26th, 2012 at 03:10
No Ben, I’m not the idiot here who’s bought into the man-made global warming swindle. I’m afraid you resemble that remark. Your not smart enough to take a look at the lies and deception to make a informed decision on whether you support it or not. Your towing the partisan line in your belief system. A democrat says it real so you believe them. Talk about a sheep needing herding. Just about everyone has stopped believing in the lie known as man-made global warming so I guess the useful idiots are thinning out and all that’s left are the hardcore “I believe you because you are a democrat” leftists.
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 26th, 2012 at 11:10
No, the vast majority of scientists believe man-made pollution is contributing to climate change. I’m a traditional conservative who believes we should err on the side of caution. You radicals are willing to destroy the earth because of your political beliefs.
lonniewalker
March 26th, 2012 at 17:16
Honestly, I doubt scientists believe anything cause they know the whole thing is bullshit. There-in lies the problem…CO2 is not a pollutant. err on the side of caution? You did know that climate monitoring stations were cut and only the stations in the hotest area was kept which makes their average temperature seem like it’s gone higher when in fact it hasn’t. I wouldn’t believe any of those scientists if F. E. Baily personally notarized their tongues because they are all pathological liars. They can’t help themselves. I’ll assure you that I’m not radical. You are the radical. There are more people that see it as I do rather than see it the way you do. Hell even Germany doesn’t support the movement anymore because they’ve gotten smart to it. Honestly it has nothing to do with politics on the Conservative Republican side. Once they were caught lying, everyone took notice and made a decision one way or another. On the Democrat side, it’s purely political because it’s a liberal democrat talking point.
Case and point, according to the idiots on your side, I have done a lot of polluting today. I drove my car 10 minutes to the gym and rode a bike for 30 minutes, Ran on the treadmill for 30 minutes, walked for 30 minutes, and lifted weights for an hour. Then I drove 10 minutes back home. I have to maintain my sex god like physique. LOL. Just think about all that CO-2 I released in the process of my workout. According to the stats I found on the web, man contributes 3 percent of the CO2 released into the atmosphere. Just think about that for a moment, if I had to give you an example, it would be like a pimple on Rosie O’Donnel’s fat ass size wise. So 3 percent is going to destroy the earth? Really? Are you serious? Mother nature produces the rest of the 97% of CO2.
Again, you have to seperate the facts from the bullshit in the man-made global warming argument because there are way more bullshit than facts.
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 27th, 2012 at 11:05
CO2 is not a pollutant
You’re getting your “science” from Michelle Bachmann. Dog shit is also a naturally occurring product, but would you want a ton of it dumped on your front lawn?
No, you are a radical. You don’t value science. You accept the belief in god and Jesus on faith alone. And for global warming, you only look at right-wing evidence that attempts to disprove it. The vast majority of scientists agree that man-made pollution is changing the climate. That is a fact. There is no “conspiracy.”
lonniewalker
March 27th, 2012 at 13:05
LMFAO, so scientists caught lying and cooking the numbers are scientists and what they say should be respected. OMFG, That’s rich!! Even for a liberal! I’ve never said I was a Christian you ass / u / me I am. No, I look at common sense when looking at man-made global warming. 3% is a very small figure. LMFAO, really? The vast majority of scientists agree? You’ve got to be fucking kidding me! There are only 2,500 that agree with the so-called conscensus.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/2053842/Scientists-sign-petition-denying-man-made-global-warming.html
Here is another little tidbit you might have missed while you were worshiping global warming scientists.
http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 27th, 2012 at 15:04
Ha! The co-author of your “scientific” report, Dr. Roy Spencer, doesn’t believe in evolution! He’s a proponent of “intelligent design.” That’s not science; that’s religion. And many of your so-called “scientists” who signed the petition are nothing but high school teachers.
Sorry Lonnie… you’re following this global warming controversy blindly.
lonniewalker
March 27th, 2012 at 13:10
Oh and let’s not forget what we know about what we know about a conscensus. I could get 10 people together and we could say the sky is green today and we could all agree to it. That doesn’t make the consensus right, it just means 10 people agree. A Conscensus has nothing to do with being right. They could all believe something without being right.
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 27th, 2012 at 15:05
The consensus is by scientists. You’re not a scientist. You’re just repeating right-wing lies.
lonniewalker
March 27th, 2012 at 18:16
Right wing lies my ass! That’s exactly how a conscensus works and like I said a conscensus only means everyone agrees not that it is right or wrong. The original article appeared in the WSJ you might be interested in it.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Global-Warming-Journal-Happer/2012/03/27/id/433983?s=al&promo_code=E891-1
LMFAO, the person who wrote that calls you warmists a cult and it’s pretty much right on the money. Again, there are more people who don’t believe in your religion/fairytale of man-made global warming so that makes you the extremist. Might makes right.
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 27th, 2012 at 19:06
NewsMax… give me a break. You’re nothing but a little sheep who just does what he’s told. I know you didn’t go to college, but did you at least graduate high school?
lonniewalker
March 27th, 2012 at 20:06
LMFAO, look who in the hell is calling anyone a sheep. The person who believes in everything a Democrat says. Nobody tells me to do anything. Nobody has that big of balls to tell me to do anything…including you. I guess that shows what an idiot you are. You’ve assumed too much in the conversation. Do you always assume stuff cause in the end ASS / U/ ME. I have an associates degree in information technology….opps I guess that popping sound was that bubble you live in that says your always right hugh? You are the last mother fucker on this earth who should be talking about someone’s intelligence. You actually believe in the man-made global warming swindle. LMFAO. Also, I hate to further hurt your pride but I also have a very high IQ.
I’ll be fair though, name one thing in Al Gore’s movie that has happened? Oh wait, none of it has happened except they busted some of the deadlines and re-issued it “another it’s going to happen by this date” date. So there is no visible or measurable evidence that global warming or global cooling is going to happen or has happened. The 1930’s still contains the hotest years and CO2 has been higher than it is now in the past. Making a case for man-made global warming isn’t looking too believable.
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 27th, 2012 at 20:44
Oooooh, an associates degree. For a right-winger, that’s pretty good! You’d be laughed at if you were a progressive democrat. 🙂 You seem to be obsessed with Al Gore. Why is that? Nothing better to do?
lonniewalker
March 27th, 2012 at 22:35
Ok, so since you don’t want to answer any questions about Al Gore’s inconvienent truth claims. Pick a climate scientists identify his claim that has come true. I’m betting you can’t because as far as I know none of their claims have come true.
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 28th, 2012 at 11:22
This was just the first hit I got. There are many more articles on the topic.
ScienceDaily (May 4, 2011) — A much reduced covering of snow, shorter winter season and thawing tundra: The effects of climate change in the Arctic are already here. And the changes are taking place significantly faster than previously thought. This is what emerges from a new research report on the Arctic, presented in Copenhagen this week. Margareta Johansson, from Lund University, is one of the researchers behind the report.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110504084032.htm
lonniewalker
March 28th, 2012 at 12:25
Well I went to nsidc.com and found that on March 6th the east side of arctic snow and ice was low while the pacific side of the arctic was unusally high.
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/
So basically the oceans won’t rise because of this condition because it’s low on one side and unusally high on the other. Still it’s not ice free like the nuts want you to believe it’s going to.
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 28th, 2012 at 16:48
That entire site is dedicated to the study of global climate change, and presents overwhelming evidence that it is occurring. Your best argument against it is a “scientist” who doesn’t believe in evolution. Face it, you’re a brainwashed, uneducated little sheep.
lonniewalker
March 27th, 2012 at 20:19
Well then again, P. T. Barnum says there is a sucker born every minute.
Lonnie
lonniewalker
March 27th, 2012 at 20:53
Really? Laughed at for a associates degree by who the basement dwellers still living at home with mama and daddy? Do you really want a response from me over that? Unlike basement dwellers, I raised 2 kids and put them through college. One is a lawyer and the other is a teacher. Well Al Gore seems to be your spokesman for your cause. He’s like the preacher of YOUR religion. He goes around the US preaching sermons in the name of man-made global warming. Honestly, you could have picked someone that lived the way they were preaching but that’s neither here nor there. Then again, this was a stall tactic because you don’t want to answer the question to begin with. I can understand that because when you boil all the claims down, you start looking like linus waiting for the Great Pumpkin to come.
Lonnie
lonniewalker
March 27th, 2012 at 21:06
That was a peanus reference in case you are wondering. LOL.
Lonnie
lonniewalker
March 28th, 2012 at 19:21
I’ll assure you that site is nothing but smoke and mirrors. So did the site even mention that the Pacific side of the arctic was unusually high? Probably not. Sites like THAT tend to cherry pick the data so they can tell you it’s proof man-made global warming is happening. They can’t have their sheep running around asking questions.
So tell me, how many times did you inaccurately tell people the hockey stick chart is proof of man-made global warming only to find out that it was made up of scientific malpractice by a scientist who severely lacks integrity?
Here’s an article that puts the MWP in perspective. This isn’t even a Conservative friendly paper, it’s the UK daily mail. Like I said before, people who believe in the fairytale are the minority. The majority do not believe in it. Not even the Germans believe in it anymore and that’s saying a lot.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2120512/Global-warming-Earth-heated-medieval-times-human-CO2-emissions.html
In case your curious about how longs it’s been since we’ve had a hurricane.
http://www.real-science.com/2351-days-vs-2-weeks
So, you guys tell us that hurricane activity is supposed to increase wiith global warming. How comes it’s beeen 2351 days since the last one?
You guys really have no answers as to why there has not been a hurricane or even where is the warming.
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 29th, 2012 at 11:49
How comes it’s beeen 2351 days since the last one?
We had a hurricane last august, you moron.
lonniewalker
March 29th, 2012 at 12:32
Hey, i didn’t write the article but if I remember correctly it didn’t hit the US.
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 29th, 2012 at 17:38
It did indeed hit the U.S, causing major damage and killing many people. There were 7 hurricanes in the Atlantic last year, 4 of which were major, but only one that made landfall.
Give it up, Lonnie. You don’t have facts on your side.
lonniewalker
March 30th, 2012 at 17:04
So Ben, I take it you don’t want to discuss the way the climate scientists refuse to honor FOIA requests? How they wet their pants when McIntyre requests to see their work. Why would it matter if their work is based on science? The UN IPCC looks very dishonest when they say their stuff is exempt from FOIA requests. It’s been my experience if it looks shady it is shady.
Lonnie
Ben Hoffman
March 30th, 2012 at 23:45
From what I’ve read, most of those who have been refused information are liars who are politicizing the science. It’s an assault on science and a waste of taxpayer money.
lonniewalker
March 31st, 2012 at 03:04
LMFAO, that proves your getting the wrong information!!!! FOIA requests are paid for by the requester. They have to pay so much for manpower + supplies. Taxpayers don’t pay jack shit for FOIA requests…the requester has to pay.
Lonnie
________________________________
Ben Hoffman
March 31st, 2012 at 11:13
When politicians make the requests for political purposes, we pay for it. I noticed you didn’t deny they’re liars who are politicizing the science.
Everything is politics for right-wingers, even pollution.
lonniewalker
March 31st, 2012 at 12:49
The reason I didn’t address that was because it was bullshit like the rest of stuff about taxpayers paying for it. It’s already a partisan political issue. The “Deniers” and “Skeptics” could be making sure these people keep their work honest. Just a partial list of some of the crap the scientists have done…add .5 to every temperature reading since the 90’s, reduce the number of monitoring stations which changes the earths overall average temperature, and now I heard instead of using the actual temperature, they are using the “Feels like” temperature. How scientific would any of these tactics be? Those are some of the stuff people have caught, it makes you wonder what none of the skeptics have caught them doing.
Lonnie
________________________________
Ben Hoffman
April 1st, 2012 at 00:29
No, the “deniers” and “skeptics” are nothing but liars and shills for big oil. That’s why you can’t cite one single credible scientist who denies man’s contribution to climate change.
lonniewalker
April 1st, 2012 at 02:12
Seems like your side does quite a bit of lying and denying that you cooked the numbers too. In fact most climate scientists couldn’t tell the truth if F. E. Bailey personally notarized their tongues. They are pathological liars and can’t help themselves.
Lonnie
________________________________
Ben Hoffman
April 1st, 2012 at 23:42
You believe they’re liars because that’s what you’re told to do. You can’t produce any credible scientists who support that notion. But I guess all scientists are liars and only right-wing think tanks hold the truth, even though they’re all in the pockets of big oil.
lonniewalker
April 2nd, 2012 at 02:38
Ok, so Michael Mann didn’t do anything dishonest? and your hero (Al Gore) had that dishonest hockey stick chart as the lead slide for his briefings for several years. That’s rich even for you!
________________________________
lonniewalker
April 2nd, 2012 at 23:03
So we know exactly where you stand. Your all for fraud as long as it’s the scientists committing fraud. It has to be that or your sheepherder (Al Gore) didn’t tell you how to answer that kind of question. Which is it?
Lonnie
lonniewalker
April 3rd, 2012 at 15:01
Another thing, didn’t “Science” approve of some of the worst treatments of the mentall ill? Most of their so-called “treatments” ruined a lot of lives. How many people’s lives did labotomy’s ruin? This should show you that sometimes science doesn’t hold any answers to any of the questions.
Lonnie